THE GOLEM TURNS ON HIS CREATOR

 

Golem: The Israeli Settler Movement is Now in Control
Golem: The Israeli Settler Movement is Now in Control

In a democratic society, a small, fanatical and highly motivated minority can influence matters more than a big but apathetic and flabby majority.

The Golem Turns on his Creator

In Jewish legend, the Golem was a man-made creature endowed with
enormous strength. Rabbi Judah Loew of Prague, also know as the
Maharal,
created him of clay and gave him life by putting a piece of paper with
the secret name of God under his tongue.
The Golem helped the Jews defend themselves against anti-Semitic
rioters, but one day he turned against his creator. He sowed ruin and
destruction, until, at the last moment, the rabbi succeeded in
extracting
the piece of paper from his mouth. The Golem turned back into a heap of
clay.
Ariel Sharon is not a rabbi and the Kabbalah is a closed book to
him. But he has created a Golem: the settlement movement in the
occupied
territories.
He was sure that the Golem would serve him. After all, the
settlers
owe him everything. It was he who nursed them for decades, diverted
funding to them on a massive scale, put at their service all the
political positions he occupied one after the other: the ministries of
agriculture, defense, foreign affairs, housing, industry and trade,
infrastructure, and, finally, the Prime Minister's office.
(I remember about 25 years ago, visiting Sharon at home in the
preparation of a biographical essay I was writing about him. My wife
and
I were sitting in the kitchen with Lilly Sharon, who served us her
delicacies, when I noticed that the chiefs of the settlers were sitting
in the adjoining room. Sharon himself went back and forth between us,
sharing his time with us equally. Even at that early stage the settlers
clearly treated him as their patron.)
During all these years, ever since he served as the Commanding
General of the Southern Sector in the early 70s, he preached to
everybody
he met, Israelis and foreigners alike, the gospel of the settlements,
spreading maps in front of them (he always has maps) and demanding that
they act. According to him, it was vitally important to set up
settlements in order to turn all of Eretz Israel - from the
Mediterranean
Sea to the Jordan River, at least - into a Jewish State, to tear the
Palestinian territories into ribbons and prevent the creation of a
Palestinian state, which would be an obstacle to the achievements of
the
full aims of Zionism.
Like a bulldozer without brakes, Sharon leveled all opposition. He
saw to it that tens of billions of dollars were turned over to the
settlements (the exact amount cannot be ascertained, being hidden in
various corners of the budget), bent the laws to their benefit and
enlisted the officers of the army in their service. In this way, a
closely woven network of settlements and special roads came into being,
with perhaps 250,000 settlers (who is counting?)
When he coined the slogan "unilateral disengagement", it never
occurred to him that the settlers might oppose him. Don't they owe him?
Are they not his pampered children? Aren't they eternally in his debt?
Sharon offered them a deal that seemed to him eminently
reasonable
(as it had once looked to Yossi Beilin, who invented it, and then to
Ehud
Barak, who tried to implement it): Give up the isolated settlements,
with
a few tens of thousands of settlers, in order to secure the future of
the
big settlement blocks, with 80% of the settlers, which will be
incorporated into Israel. Sacrifice some fingers in order to save the
whole body. This way not only do we save the settlement enterprise, but
we also gain the better part of the West Bank.
But the Golem, once the piece of paper is under his tongue,
demonstrates a logic of his own. He does not intend to give up the
dozens
of small settlements, especially as that is were the hard core of
Messianic fanatics lives. He also understood that the evacuation of the
first settlement would create a precedent that would endanger all the
others. The real settlers may have nothing but contempt for the Gush
Katif "settlers", who are first and foremost calculating businessmen,
but
they understand the crucial importance of the battle for Gush Katif.
Like the Maharal, Sharon underrated his Golem. He treated him as a
servant. How could he respect a creature that he had created with his
own
hands? Now he is learning that it is much easier to create a Golem than
to reverse the process.
In the surfeit of interviews that Sharon gave last weekend, he
declared that the settlers are only a small minority of the people. And
indeed, even according to the settlers themselves, they constitute less
than 4% of the citizens of Israel. But the numbers do not reflect their
actual power. In a democratic society, a small, fanatical and highly
motivated minority can influence matters more than a big but apathetic
and flabby majority.
Sharon speculated on the unpopularity of the settlers in Israel.
They are violent and unruly; they speak, dress and behave differently,
even their body-language is different. The ordinary Israeli sees them
as
a bizarre sect. Also, at long last is has dawned on the Israelis that
the
settlements are devouring the billions that are needed for Israel's
economic and social recovery.
But in the course of the decades, the settlers have set up an
extensive apparatus of control and propaganda. Patiently, they have
infiltrated the army, where they now occupy the key positions once held
by Kibbutzniks. Their independent media are expanding, while the Left
has
in the course of the years given up literally all their independent
media. The settlers are in possession of huge funds, not only the money
that flows to them through hundreds of channels from the state coffers,
and not only the lavish donations from American Jewish multi-
millionaires, but also from the plentiful resources of the American
Christian evangelists.
One may well ask: what foolishness possessed Sharon, when he
proposed that the Likud members, of all people, should decide on his
plan? Did he not realize that this is the only arena where the settlers
can command superior forces?
Why? As usual with victory-drunk generals: out of sheer arrogance
and contempt for the opponent. At the pinnacle of political power, he
disparaged the settlers. He did not dream of the mass home visits. He
underrated their emotional appeal and their well-oiled logistic
machine,
that was created with the money of the state.
Most of the settlers constitute a disciplined body. Like any
messianic sect, they unquestioningly obey their commanders, the "Yesha
rabbis" (Yesha is the Hebrew acronym for Judea, Samaria and Gaza.) This
is a totalitarian structure, in the true sense of the term: total
faith,
total organization, total discipline.
"My head supports the Sharon plan, but my heart supports the
settlers," a Likud member confessed. That is quite natural: when a
settler pair with attached baby (there is always a baby attached!)
knocks
at the door and asks: "Do you want to evict us from our home?" - how
can
he resist? After all, from the day he was born he has heard that the
national aim is to possess the whole of Eretz Israel, that the settlers
are the salt of the earth, that one can ignore the rest of the world -
and suddenly this man, Sharon, comes and says the opposite?
Yet it must be remembered that less than 2% of the Israeli
electorate voted against the Sharon plan in this party referendum. (In
the last elections, the Likud received less than 30% of the votes. Less
then a quarter of these are Likud members, who were entitled to take
part
in the referendum. Of these, less than half did actually vote, and of
these, less than 60% voted against the plan. These, together with the
settlers who are not Likud members, compose the Golem.)
One good thing has come from this referendum: suddenly the public
has woken up and seen the Golem that has come to life in their midst.
From the first moment, the writing was on the wall: the settler
movement
is sucking the marrow from the state, it is an obstacle to peace, it is
a
danger to Israeli democracy and to the future of the state itself. Now
the general public, too, sees the danger represented by this rampaging
Golem.
It is not too late to remove the piece of paper from beneath the
Golem's tongue. Not yet!

Posted by David James Vickery

add a comment on this article

The Danger at Home

Haaretz (Israeli Newspaper) Editorial 04.May.2004 23:47

Look at what Ariel Sharon has produced:
Look at what Ariel Sharon has produced:

The danger at home



The results of the Likud's referendum on the disengagement plan sent shock waves throughout broad segments of the public. Once again it became evident that the settlers set the agenda for the State of Israel. While they are a small minority, they are highly motivated, well organized with a firm ideology and enormous financial resources - some directly from government ministries - and driven with a messianic passion and readiness for sacrifice, including life.




Nothing stands up against them. There is no parliament or extra-parliamentary movement that forms a counter-balance to the settlers. Peace Now, which used to turn out hundreds of thousands to demonstrations in favor of the peace process, has grown tired and evaporated. And all this happened when a majority of the public actually favors a withdrawal from Gaza and supports reaching a peace agreement with the Palestinians, even if it means far-reaching concessions.

Ever since Gush Emunim took over Sebastia in December 1975, all Israeli governments have twisted, stammered and lied when it comes to the settlements in the territories. Some did so for ideological reasons, while others gave in to pressure, but the end result has been that every year, the taxpayers send huge amounts of money to expand the settlements that encourage the construction of homes for young married couples, bridges, roads and bypass roads. When the pressure mounts, the government makes promises - sometimes to us and sometimes to the U.S. government - about settlement freezes, but they never take place.

The Gaza settlements are the height of absurdity, hubris of outrageous dimensions. Despite all the billions that have been invested in the area, only 7,500 Jews live in 20 isolated venues and have no chance of surviving without an enormous military presence protecting them. It's a brutal occupation that has given a third of the land including water resources, to those 7,500 people, while 1.3 million Arabs live on 65 percent of the land in terribly overcrowded conditions and horrifying poverty. This occupation threatens the existence of the state. Every reasonable person understands that the situation cannot go on forever without some terrible explosion.

When Prime Minister Ariel Sharon reached the proper conclusion and presented the public with a disengagement plan, it may not have been perfect but it could have served as the start of a reconciliation process - the beginning of a political horizon - and even advanced the settlement cause in the West Bank. The settlers understood the danger quite clearly and rose up as one to oppose the Sharon plan - and they won. Now they are in the grip of euphoria with a feeling that they have managed to reconquer the hearts of the Jewish nation.

After the Oslo agreement, the settlers said that while they managed to settle the land, they did not succeed in winning over the hearts of the people. Now, after the results of the Likud referendum, it turns out that they managed to win over some of those hearts. The fact is that the vote in development towns was in favor of the settlements.

A zealous, religious and messianic minority already led the people of Israel to the destruction of the Second Commonwealth 2,000 years ago. Now the struggle is over the Third Commonwealth.

Posted by David James Vickery