Tsunami nuclear blast, not earthquake?

Was the tsunami the result of a U.S. nuclear bomb?

With Afghanistan and Iraq already lost, the Wall Street bankers were all
desperately looking for other ways to control our world, when suddenly and
very conveniently, the Sumatran Trench exploded. Trick or Treat?


"Others are engaging even in an eco type of terrorism, whereby they can
alter the climate, set off earthquakes or volcanos remotely, through the use
of electromagnetic waves." American
Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, April 1997. Big surprise! Presumably
Cohen already knew that a nuclear weapon generates what he refers to
obliquely as "electromagnetic waves".

Despite having a huge number of tsunami victims in its own State of Tamil
Nadu, India completely converted the survey ship INS Nirupak into a 50-bed
floating hospital in less than 72 hours, then sent it unarmed to help the
desperate people of Aceh in Indonesia. . By direct comparison, America sent
combat ships and armed Marines. The US Navy has two 1,000 bed hospital
ships, the 'Comfort' and the 'Mercy', but neither one was dispatched.
Though the USNS Comfort was deployed to New York when 3,000 Americans died
in September 2001, this current lack of action sends a strong signal that
150,000 (mostly Muslim) dead in South East Asia, and half a million injured,
are of no concern whatever to the power brokers in New York.

The Indian Government knew full well that this was not a "normal"
earthquake. On 27 December India refused to join George Bush's planned
exclusive 'club of four', which would have effectively pulled this Asian
nuclear power out of its new coalition with Russia, China and Brazil. On 28
December the Indian Government politely warned the American military to stay
clear of Indian sovereign territory, and on 29 December the India Daily
Editorial publicly questioned the nature of the event: "Was this a showdown
by a country to show the region what havoc can be created?" ... "Given the
level of devastation and given the fact India is a regional power in South
Asia, [the] Indian Navy has an obligation to investigate and tell the world
what they found."

Theoretically, the American 9 megaton W-53 thermonuclear warhead shown on
the left, could easily be encased in a small 'lookalike' saturation diving
chamber similar to that on the right, to protect it from the massive 10,000
pounds per square inch pressures at the bottom of the Sumatran Trench. The
whole armored package would weigh less than five tons, allowing it to be
slipped over the stern of any oil rig supply vessel, of which there are more
than 300 in Asia alone. Who would even notice?

Despite a natural human tendency to be shocked into silence by
the sheer number of dead and injured across Asia on 26 December 2004, and
despite also being slightly fearful of losing personal credibility because
of the magnitude of the apparent crime, there are many provable
irregularities in the official American tsunami story that simply have to be
recorded now, or forever be lost in the sands of time.

It is beyond any doubt that a giant tidal wave (tsunami) smashed
its way through South and South East Asia, and still had enough legs to
continue all the way across the Indian Ocean to Africa, where it killed and
injured a few hundred more. So the only question we must ask, is whether
this tsunami was a natural or man-made catastrophe? A natural event would be
horrifying enough, but if the tsunami was man-made, then we are
unquestionably looking at the biggest single war crime in global history.

To make any sense at all of the irregularities, we must start at
the very beginning, and then follow the course of events as they unfold,
especially events in the immediate vicinity of the real tsunami epicenter,
because the latter is quite different from the location being remorselessly
peddled by the New York Times and CNN.

At midday local Australian time I faithfully recorded the
magnitude and position plotted by the Jakarta Geophysical Office in
Indonesia. An earthquake measuring 6.4 on the Richter scale had hit the
north of the Indonesian island of Sumatra. The Jakarta Geophysical Office
meticulously noted that the epicenter of the event was located 155 miles
south-southwest of Aceh Province.

This location is approximately 250 miles south of the position
later selected by the American NOAA, which plotted the epicenter to the
north-west of Aceh, and initially claimed a Richter reading of 8.0. Alas,
even that was not enough to cover the damage caused by this extraordinary
event, so NOAA progressively upgraded the reading to 8.5, then to 8.9, and
finally to 9.0 - at least for the present.

So, the first proven irregularities were peddled by American
officials at the NOAA, who suddenly invented a new 'flexible' peak seismic
wave for the event, of far greater magnitude than Jakarta, when the Jakarta
office was located much closer at almost point-blank range. Believe me when
I tell you there is no such thing as the new 'flexible' peak claimed by
NOAA. The first seismic peak you record is the only real peak, unless of
course you later manually draw in a few more peaks of your own, to match a
contrived agenda. Naturally there is also only one epicenter, which was
faithfully recorded by dozens of Indonesian and Indian seismographs.

Quite apart from the huge disparity in Richter values, the
Indonesians and Indians were disturbed to find that the normal earthquake
'preamble' was missing from their seismograph charts. All this means is
that the normal steadily increasing number of transverse shear "S" waves
that always precede an earthquake were missing, as were later aftershocks,
which likewise always accompany a naturally occurring or Tesla standing-wave
generated earthquake. There were 'warnings' of aftershocks from the NOAA,
but none actually eventuated.

To simplify matters for non-technical readers, an earthquake is
always triggered by a resonant electromagnetic frequency in the range 0.5 to
12 Hertz, but it is not an instant process, because the resonant frequency
must be precise. Thus as true resonance approaches, the fault line starts to
tremble like a piece of rope under tension, and sends out warnings to the
seismographs in the form of steadily increasing transverse shear waves.

If all you get is a cluster of "P" compression waves, then you
are almost certainly looking at an underground or sub sea explosion. These
were in fact the only copious seismic signals that the Indonesians and
Indians received, and they looked curiously similar to those generated many
years ago by large underground nuclear weapons in Nevada.

We will return later to the relatively simple task of delivering
a multi-megaton thermonuclear weapon to the bottom of the Sumatran Trench,
and then detonating it with awesome effect, but right now we need to return
to our initial task of following the trail of events and inexplicable
irregularities. First we must travel south to the distant desert island of
Australia, currently ruled by an obsequious Wall Street toady known as
Little Johnny Howard. To the intense displeasure of many of his Australian
"subjects", Little Johnny never makes a move outside Australia unless he
first receives explicit instructions from one of his New York minders.
Remember this reality, because it is extremely important in terms of what
Australia did next.
On the morning of 27 December, the Australian (New York owned)
media was making it very clear that the most badly hit nation in the region
was Sri Lanka, an island at the southern tip of India, which like Australia
is a member nation of the British Commonwealth. Accordingly, Tim Costello,
head of one of Australia's largest charities, made immediate plans to fly to
the area and assess the need for aid. But that same morning, Little Johnny
was dancing to a very different tune, which, based on his known
subservience, must have been playing down his secure telephone line from
Wall Street.

In true covert manner, Little Johnny secretly dispatched two
RAAF Hercules transport planes packed with supplies to Malaysia on "Stand
By", and directed two more to Darwin in Australia's north. Please note that
if Little Johnny had any humanitarian concerns at all, all four Hercules
could have flown directly to Commonwealth partner Sri Lanka, where every
other Australian had already been told by the media that aid was needed. But
no, it wasn't to be, and Little Johnny waited patiently for orders from New

The waiting period was short, and after a high-flying
reconnaissance jet confirmed that the runway was clear at Medan in eastern
Sumatra, all four Australian Hercules complete with troops, guns and other
tackle, invaded Sumatra just south of the devastated province of Aceh. In
turn, with 90% of its population killed by the tsunami, Aceh might perhaps
one day soon become Indonesia's very own Guantanamo Bay, crawling with
hundreds of heavily armed Australians and Americans.

Remember carefully though, at the time these four Hercules
touched down in Medan, the ordinary Australian public still had no idea that
Sumatra was badly hit. Only Little Johnny knew, and of course his trusty
crystal ball in New York. To hell with Sri Lanka, his bosses wanted a main
base for the huge reconstruction contracts in Asia, designed to replace the
failed oil theft and reconstruction in Iraq, and keep poor old Zion on its
tottering New York legs for a few more weeks or months.

In the end, what the hell did it matter how many Goyim had to
die? And, hey, on the credit side they'd already managed to kill more than
100,00 Muslims in Sumatra with a single tidal wave, which was partial
payback for their own resounding defeats in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Needless to say the Australians were merely the advance party,
soon to be joined by a curiously well prepared and equipped U.S. Military,
though it is doubtful that any of the officers and men involved really
comprehend what is going on. Only a handful thought to question why they had
been spending a whole year training for a "Humanitarian Mission", when the
whole point of the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps is normally to kill people in
very large numbers. Just look at Fallujah, people, look at Fallujah.

As if by magic, the Pentagon managed to have two battle groups
ready to sail at an instant's notice from Hong Kong and Guam during the
normally chaotic Christmas to New Year period. Crikey! Military discipline
has come a hell of a long way since my day, when everyone including the
ship's cat was sleeping it off at some highly questionably hostelry or
another. Not these 10,000+ Americans though, who must have been standing
rigidly to attention beside their hammocks day and night, tugging furiously
at their forelocks whenever an officer of NCO came in sight.

The next bit was superbly orchestrated, because it took place at
sea, far away from the prying eyes of dock spies or imaginary KGB agents.
But oops, first you have to know who was involved. Out of Hong Kong rushed
team one, comprised of the nuclear-powered USS Abraham Lincoln and her
escort vessels, while the far more interesting team two rushed out of Guam,
led by the USS Bonhomme Richard, a marine amphibious assault carrier crammed
to the gunwales with gun-toting wooden tops. And that is not all, believe
me, because the Bonhomme Richard is in fact leading a veritable armada known
as "Expeditionary Strike Group 5".

Flagship USS Bonhomme Richard is accompanied by the U.S.S.
Duluth, an amphibious transport dock vessel; the USS Rushmore, a landing
ship dock; the guided missile cruiser USS Bunker Hill, guided missile
destroyer USS Milius, and the guided missile frigate USS Thach. To take care
of the underwater side of things they are joined by the nuclear
hunter-killer submarine USS Pasadena, while the U.S. Coast Guard's
high-endurance cutter Munro is also tagging along, presumably to deal with
Asian Customs and Excise.

Now then, though 'Strike Group 5' may be toting enough nuclear
weapons to destroy half of the known world, and the title is perhaps lacking
when viewed from a strictly humanitarian perspective, engineer chief Staff
Sgt. Julio C. Dominguez says otherwise: "The Marine Service Support Group
has been preparing for a humanitarian mission of this type for about 12
months now, and is more prepared for an actual mission". Well, OK chief, but
didn't you ask why you were being trained for a mysterious humanitarian
mission a year before it actually happened, especially when your day job is
normally shooting Muslims full of holes?

The really sneaky (inexplicable) bit came as both battle groups
entered the Indian Ocean. The USS Abraham Lincoln looked about as innocent
as a carrier with 70 attack planes can look, but was already carrying 2,000
marines instead of her normal complement of around 500. That is a huge
amount of grunt firepower to put on the deserted streets of Banda Aceh,
especially when Wall Street normally expects these marines to die quietly
for Zion in Iraq. Now then, how did they know the extra marines would be
needed before team one left Hong Kong, because the surplus 1,500 marines
were certainly not just standing around on Kowloon dock waiting to hitch a

Then while the two battle groups (apparently) headed in two
different directions across the deserted Indian Ocean, an even stranger
event took place. Though Expeditionary Strike Group 5 (Humanitarian) was
supposed to help the folks in Sri Lanka, the combat marines aboard the USS
Bonhomme Richard transferred to amphibious transport dock vessel U.S.S.
Duluth, which then split from ESG-5 and headed towards team one. So without
the Indonesians really being aware of it, the (relatively) harmless and
Bulky aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln has been used to screen the
arrival of at least 3,500 heavily-armed US Marines in tiny Aceh Province.

That more or less brings us up to date on known military
activity, though yesterday an Australian television cameraman did
accidentally film some of these heavily-armed US Marines (who tried to shoo
him away), searching a devastated Indonesian military base for any remaining
weapons. Now call me old-fashioned, but if these guys and their bosses are
straight, that particular job should be left to the Indonesian Army...

I will be circumspect as to exactly how a large American
thermonuclear weapon managed to arrive at the bottom of the Sumatran Trench,
though all of the seismic evidence and preparedness for the resulting
mission indicates strongly that this is the case. After all, we are back to
the age-old question of "who benefits?", and in this particular case, "Who
is insane enough to kill more than 150,000 civilians just to hang on to
power?' Based on their past performance in Iraq and other luckless
countries, it would seem that the only realistic candidates are Wolfowitz
and company, striving as always to create a "One World Government".

Certainly no other nuclear powers including Russia and China
stand to gain anything at all from such an outrageous mass murder, so, as
always in the end, we come back to Sherlock Holmes via the pen of Sir
Arthur Conan Doyle: "When you have ruled out the impossible, whatever
remains, no matter how improbable, is the truth."

For the Zionist Cabal, obtaining a thermonuclear weapon in
America is no great trick, especially when we have the precedent of 100
small 'decommissioned' air-to-air atomic warheads being smuggled out the
Pentagon's (civilian) back door, to form the core of the Jewish State's
current nuclear arsenal. Once a weapon system is out date and out of
service, loyal uniformed US military personnel can no longer track it.

Those who wish to understand how such a seemingly small weapon
could rattle a 20,000 feet-deep oceanic trench, and then force a giant
tsunami right across the Indian Ocean, would do well to look at the diagram
of the famous 'Dambusters' attacking the German dam below, most of which is

The designer of the RAF's bouncing bomb (actually called
"Highball") was a scientist called Barnes Wallace, who had already gained a
formidable reputation with his Wellington bomber, which he constructed
geodetically, thus enabling it to absorb enormous punishment before actually
being shot out of the sky. Many Wellington returned to base literally in
tatters, while many luckless cousins like the Stirling and Halifax were all
too often consigned to the murky deep of the North Sea.

Wallace knew that bombing the dams vertically was a complete
waste of time, and the only possibility of success lay in placing a mine
hard up against the dam wall at its base. You see, water cannot be
compressed, meaning that if the mine was pressed against the dam wall at the
moment of detonation, part of its energy would automatically be expended on
the wall itself. Too far away in the relatively shallow water, and most of
the blast energy would be lost to atmosphere, in a huge exploding cloud of
water of course.

Though it was obvious that the dam wall could not be destroyed
by a single bomb from a single Lancaster bomber (it would weight far too
much for the aircraft to get off the ground), Wallace pinned his hopes on
the scientific fact that cumulative stress should do the job, and he was
proved right. Though officially three of the bombs, each containing 6,500
pounds of TNT, were considered to be direct hits, one of these veered off
slightly, meaning that the giant Mohne Dam was completely breached by a
total of 13,000 pounds of tri-nitro toluene.

It is the incompressibility of water in particular that matters
deep down in the Sumatran Trench. At the bottom you already have 10,000
pounds of pressure per square inch pressing down on your weapon of choice,
and above that weapon there is a column of water 20,000 feet tall, which is
what caused the pressure in the first place. Not only that. The trench
narrows at the bottom, meaning that the weapon is 'hemmed-in', with a very
real chance of moving a tectonic plate if sufficient tonnage is used.

In this particular case there was no real need to shift a
tectonic plate, and science suggests that if this blast had caused such an
effect, several very powerful aftershocks would have occurred, as has
happened with every other major earthquake in the past. But, as previously
stated, and setting aside the seemingly deliberate provocative though false
warnings from the American NOAA, there has not been a single aftershock.

To force subservience on Asia, and ensure the lion's share of
incredibly lucrative reconstruction contracts, all that was needed was a
very large tsunami targeted on the selected nations, which was easily within
the capabilities of a large thermonuke. There is nothing new about "Sea
Bursts" as they are called, and more than 30 years ago plans existed in both
America and Russia to wipe out each other's coastal cities using exactly
this technique. The tidal wave from a deep sea burst is relatively clean,
allowing the aggressor to take over both land and remaining buildings etc.
with the minimum of delay.

If everything had gone to plan, then Indonesia, Sri Lanka and
India would have been in hock to the IMF and World Bank for thirty or more
years - time enough to wait for the price of oil to come down again after
the lethal fiasco in Iraq. At the same time, if the Indian Government had
taken the bait, the deadly Russian-Chinese-Indian-Brazilian coalition would
have been dead in the water. Not a bad day's work for a single thermonuclear
weapon discreetly removed from the decommissioning process.

There are those who may claim that I have 'left out' the giant
ExxonMobil gas fields in Aceh, but that is not the case. Certainly they are
very productive sub-surface fields, and will unquestionably produce lots of
gas again once the surface equipment has been repaired, but in isolation
they are completely incapable of saving the New Zion from collapse. Wall
Street needs giant reconstruction contracts, and plenty of them.

If I remember correctly, shortly before Christmas I received a
large number of emails from various people about some "German Guy", who
apparently claimed that Wolfowitz had got hold of a critical weapon and was
going to nuke Houston on either the 26 or 27 of December. I never did read
the whole email, but it seems very likely that it was initially circulated
by Wolfowitz or one of his ilk, as a classic disinformation distraction. Try
something along the lines of "You suckers all watch Houston very carefully
on 26 December, while I nuke Asia behind your backs... "

add a comment on this article

Sounds feasible

susanscully 05.Jan.2005 08:47

A quick comment. Right from the start, I did not just assume it was a natural disaster. Thanks for the article. I hope you're wrong about this, but I have this creepy feeling...I hope others will catch on and at least give it some thought.


Queer Planet 05.Jan.2005 15:43

While it wouldn't surprise me if Bush and company nuked Europe so that they could start a cattle ranch, I have to wonder about your scenario.

Nuclear weapons cause radiation. The water would have been irradiated and thousands of fish would be floating around the Indian Ocean right now, not to mention sea plants.

The radiation would spread and eventually reach land if it were that close to shore as you say. There would now be thousands of people dying from radiation exposure.

Now maybe they used a non radioactive device. I don't know.

But what would be good for your article is if you could present the actual records of the varying seismac readings, proof that there were no aftershocks, and all else.

Bush and company are capable of all many of atrocity as we can see in Iraq, but let's not stray into fiction when the truth is bad enough.


Peter Bevan 05.Jan.2005 17:52

I'm sure many of us would dep down love this to be true, but I have to say it strikes me as fairly contencious.

1) Any atomic blast would have to be enormous (several thousand Hiroshimas).. not impossible but expensive and obvious.

2) There *WERE* aftershocks.. even one as sceptical as myself about mainstream news media finds it hard to belive that so many news agencies (and first hand accounts) are wrong on this one.

3) This idea that P-Waves have a wavelength of 0.5-12Hz would mean surely waves between 15,000 and 30,000 miles... far to large to be discernable on such a tiny object as earth.

4) There are a number of pretty tenusous political links here.. Does the disharmony between the US and India really explain all this? Hardly...

It does raise some interesting questions to be sure.. primarily; Why did the US send so many armed combatents? There is however a world of difference between oppurtunism and mass murder.