Faheem Lodhi - another non-terrorist jailed under Australia's 'anti-terror' laws?

 
Jack Thomas, a non-terrorist, has been jailed under Australia's anti-terror laws. Now, Faheem Lodhi, has been convicted under the anti-terror laws but the evidence is flimsy and circumstantial. It seems likely that he is to be another example of the misuse of Australia's anti-terror laws for political purposes against individuals who are not a threat to Australia.

Faheem Lodhi - another non-terrorist jailed under Australia’s ‘anti-terror’ laws?
Colin Mitchell

In Australia a non-terrorist is jailed under anti-terror laws. Jack Thomas was pursued by Australia’s secret intelligence agency ASIO and the Australian Federal Police (AFP) for 3 years. Federal Police alleged that he was a ‘sleeper agent’ for terrorists. At his trial he was cleared of all allegations that he was a terrorist yet was still convicted and jailed under the anti-terror laws of 2002. He was convicted for receiving money from a terrorist even though the jury and judge accepted that he had no intention of using the money for terrorist purposes. Jack’s jailing does not fulfill the stated purpose of the anti-terror legislation – to protect Australia from terrorism. Instead it shows that the anti-terror laws can be misused to jail non-terrorists for political purposes. In the process the security agencies had not protected Australia but wasted their time, resources and our money pursuing a non-terrorist.

The arrest and deportation of American peace activist Scott Parkin has been the most recent dramatic illustration that ASIO acts in a partisan political manner and can falsely accuse individuals of being a threat to national security for political purposes. In the future security agencies could use the anti-terror laws to suppress dissent.

Now, Sydney architect Faheem Khalid Lodhi, convicted on June 19 of preparing for a terrorist act, faces sentencing in Sydney on August 23. He was arrested in January 2004, charged under the new “anti-terror” laws and has been locked up in solitary confinement at Goulburn super-max prison ever since. He faces possible life imprisonment.

Lodhi’s conviction has been loudly trumpeted by politicians, security agencies and the corporate media as a vindication of the new terror laws. But it is far from certain that Lodhi had any terrorist intentions, or that he is a threat to Australia.

Lodhi first came to the attention of the security agencies when Willy Brigitte came to Australia and was later deported back to France in 2003. Lodhi had arranged accommodation for Brigitte and, due to this association, was intensively investigated by the security agencies. At Lodhi’s trial this year the prosecution highlighted Lodhi’s association with Brigitte but it has not been proven that Brigitte was a security threat to Australia.

The media alleged that Brigitte was a dangerous terrorist who had been planning to commit a terrorist act in Australia. These allegations all came from one source - France’s most powerful “anti-terrorist” judge Jean-Louis Bruguiere, who has been criticised by civil libertarians for using intimidation to extract information and confessions. Bruguiere had Brigitte arrested when he was deported to France in 2003, and he has been held without trial ever since. Can we really trust allegations coming from this source?

Bruguiere alleged that Brigitte trained at a Lashkar-e-Toiba (LET) camp and the Australian Federal Police (AFP) have adopted Bruguiere’s theory that a LET group in Sydney, including Lodhi, was preparing a terrorist attack in Australia. But experts in terrorism have cast doubt on this. Clive Williams, a security analyst from the Australian National University, has argued that LeT “would be unlikely to be interested itself in terrorist activities in Australia” (The Australian, 5 November 2003, p 13). The reason is that LET are focused on the conflict between India and Pakistan over Kashmir.

Early in Lodhi’s trial, the prosecution alleged that Lodhi himself attended a LET camp, but the witnesses, held in US and Singaporean jails, were discredited as unreliable. Al Hamdi, the US witness, had already been described by US authorities as an unreliable witness, yet AFP officers still asked him to testify in Lodhi’s case. The AFP had previously told an Australian prisoner in Lebanon that if he would return to Australia and plead guilty to planning an attack on Sydney Harbour and recruiting other Sydney men for the purpose, he would receive a 60% reduction in his sentence. Clearly the AFP will go to great lengths to obtain convictions.

Whipped up by the Howard government’s support for the post-9/11 “war on terror”, security agencies seem predisposed to see terrorist plots, accumulate flimsy evidence and secure convictions. With an already fearful public, the threshold of “beyond reasonable doubt” becomes drastically lowered.

Circumstantial evidence

Apart from the association with Brigitte, there were five main pieces of evidence presented against Lodhi at his trial. All were circumstantial.

First, Lodhi was accused of downloading from the internet aerial photos of three military sites around Sydney for a terrorist attack. But at the trial, it was clear that a colleague at the architect’s firm where Lodhi worked discovered the photo site and told his colleagues. Soon everyone was downloading pictures. Lodhi downloaded the military sites because he had worked at them and wanted them for his CV. He made no attempt to hide the fact that he was downloading the pictures. The jury exonerated Lodhi of downloading the photos with any terrorist intent.

Second, Lodhi, openly in the office environment, enquired about prices of chemicals and arranged for a chemical firm to fax him their prices. The chemicals in question all had uses as detergents; some could also be used to make explosives.

Lodhi explained he planned to start a business exporting detergents to Pakistan to be used in tanneries. At the trial, family and friends confirmed he had discussed these plans with them. He never did acquire chemicals and he had no equipment for making explosives.

Third, he bought two schematic diagrams of the Australian electricity grid. Lodhi said he was investigating another business venture - exporting generators to Pakistan, a country with major deficiencies in its electricity grid. Lodhi said he wanted the maps to promote his contemplated business. The prosecution argued that Lodi wanted to bomb the grid. But, as Lodhi’s defence pointed out, the generalised diagrams would have been useless to a terrorist wanting locations for an attack.

Fourth, a “terrorist manual” was discovered in Lodhi’s office drawer. This was 15 pages, torn from an exercise book, of recipes for explosives, detonators and poisons copied from an internet site some years earlier. Lodhi said he had come across the site while studying at Sydney University, jotted down some notes and forgot about them. Lodhi’s lawyer characterised the notes, which included a recipe for invisible ink, as “unsophisticated’” and a “boys own” spy kit rather than material for potential terrorists.

Describing these notes as a “terrorist manual” is hyperbole. The internet sites in question do not contain detail that could be useful for real terrorists. Many teenage males get excited with the idea of home-made “bombs”, but they are not terrorists. Surely we need more evidence than notes jotted down from such a site to believe that Lodhi had serious intent to make bombs for terrorism. Lodhi had not acquired any of the ingredients, or equipment, to actually make any explosive devices.

Fifth, the prosecution produced a CD, DVD and video of extremist material that the police allege was found at Lodhi’s home. Lodhi has denied any knowledge of this material.

Adhering to a radical ideology is not a crime, and does not constitute evidence that a person is a terrorist. But there is also reason to doubt that Lodhi does have radical Islamic views. He was opposed to the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, but expressed equal abhorrence at the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack saying “My opinion is it was wrong. Killing innocent people is not part of Islam.” In court, Lodhi swore an oath on the Koran, and denied he planned a bomb attack or that he had associated with members of a terrorist group.

Given his expressed views against terrorism and that he denied ever seeing the material before, it is possible it was planted by the Federal Police or ASIO. The Woods Royal commission into police corruption in NSW found multiple cases in which police planted evidence and AFP officers were involved. If the AFP are highly motivated to get a conviction, and especially if they believe their suspect is guilty, they may regard it as ethical to plant evidence in order to convict an individual who they believe is dangerous. Certainly this material was used to influence the jury in a dramatic way.

There was more drama when a police explosives expert was brought in to describe in lurid detail the deadly effect of exploding urea nitrate in the courtroom. The prosecution claimed that Lodhi could have manufactured urea nitrate from the chemicals he had enquired about the prices for - but had not acquired.

But with no equipment, no plans and no evidence pointing to a particular target, it is difficult to understand how the evidence presented at Lodhi’s trial can possibly be regarded as proving beyond a reasonable doubt that he intended to carry out a terrorist act in the future.

Phillip Boulten, Lodhi’s lawyer, pointed out, Lodhi was being investigated “in a hypervigilant ... post 9/11 investigative environment” and that, acting on the theory that he was a terrorist “every little piece of information that [investigators] could find that would fit into this theory ... has been plucked out and presented in this trial.” (AAP by Kim Arlington 19 June, 2006)

Beyond reasonable doubt?
The jury was deadlocked for a week before being sent back by the judge to come to a unanimous agreement. In this kind of pressure-cooker situation jurors can be pressured to agree on a verdict, compromising justice. Juries can also get it wrong, especially when influenced by strong public opinion. Since 9/11, it is inevitable that the justice system will be influenced by the “war on terror”.

If the jury decided Lodhi had no plan to attack a military site, why did it decide he was planning to attack the electricity grid? Lodhi was convicted of preparing for a terrorist act by acquiring maps of Australia’s electricity grid, inquiring about the prices of chemicals and possessing notes copied from the internet years earlier on making poisons, invisible ink and amateur explosives. It is alarming that such weak circumstantial evidence has been regarded as evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. If this is the kind of evidence that indicates preparation for a terrorist attack, very many Australians could also be convicted as terrorists. Laws that allow conviction on the basis of what someone might do, rather than what they have done, or have even planned to do, are in themselves wrong. Such laws can potentially be used against a large section of the population, and this makes abuse of the laws easy.

It is likely that Lodhi has been wrongly convicted. Lodhi’s case must not be allowed to pass by unchallenged. It is likely that Lodhi’s conviction demonstrates, as already demonstrated in the Jack Thomas debacle, that anti-terror laws are being used to jail non-terrorists for political purposes.

[Colin Mitchell is a campaigner with Civil Rights Defence in Melbourne, Australia >. This article also is to be published in Green Left Weekly magazine www.greenleft.org.au and has been abridged from a longer article which can be found at >

add a comment on this article

Draconian Laws

Links 16.Aug.2006 13:25

Pictured: Faheem Lodhi
Pictured: Faheem Lodhi

Pictured Faheem Lodhi

Related:

Terrorism scapegoat was kidnapped, court hears

The Melbourne Magistrates Court has heard a man charged with [allegedly] directing a terrorist organisation was kidnapped last year.

The court was told Abdul Benbrika alleged in a conversation recorded by police that he was questioned and hit during an abduction which lasted about six hours.

The defendant did not indicate who was responsible for the alleged kidnapping.

Magistrate Paul Smith heard police initiated an internal investigation into the alleged kidnapping, but it was dropped after numerous efforts to contact Benbrika.

HoWARd's abc 15 August 2006

Magistrate allows AK-47 photo to prejudice scapegoat trial

No doubt that the magistrate seeks to incorporate the media throughout the proceedings of these innocent men because of a lack of concrete evidence and just so they can be used as scapegoat's for hoWARd's war on terror.

 http://adelaide.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/19476

Former medical student to stand trial in kangaroo court!

Lawyers for the 23-year-old argue the charge is not constitutionally valid because they say the laws cannot cover alleged acts committed on foreign soil which do not have an Australian connection.

 http://adelaide.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/19027

Student loses bid for High Court hearing

Lawyers for the 23-year-old argue the charge is not constitutionally valid because they say the laws cannot cover alleged acts committed on foreign soil which do not have an Australian connection.

 http://adelaide.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/18535

Attorney General Ruddock is Oddball over anti-terrorist laws!Attorney

Attorney General Ruddock attacks different laws.

 http://adelaide.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/17746

Australia's Guantanamo

Have the 13 Muslim men arrested under Australia's new anti-terror laws been subjected to Guantanamo Bay-style conditions? It's an allegation being made by Civil Rights Defence

 http://adelaide.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/18341

Major Michael Mori writes re David Hicks

The US Supreme Court has ruled the special Guantanamo trials illegal. An acceptable solution from the Americans is likely years away and our Government has run out of excuses not to act. Nearly 40,000 Australians have put their name to the Open Letter calling for David Hicks to be repatriated. I hope you'll join us now by clicking on the link:

 http://www.getup.org.au/campaign/DefendAustralianRights

International Protest Day calls for the end of Guantánamo Bay

 http://adelaide.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/17099

Judges weigh 'Joseph Thomas's' appeal! Get your facts right!

What would she have imposed for stealing a passport?

 http://newswire.indymedia.org/en/2006/07/843328.shtml

Joseph Thomas conviction immoral

AN EMBARRASSING conviction based on TORTURE IMMORAL

 http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2006/07/117441.php

Standardising terrorism in the prison population?

Try giving us hope, access to our communities, a sense of caring by the outside community. And letting us out to make restitution instead of building festering anger.

 http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2006/07/117580.php

Scapegoats accused 'exploited' by guberment prostitutor

The rest of the prisoners had to stay in jail in AA maximum security segregted with no contact with human people in a box within a box with no fresh air or sunlight with the worst of the worst offenders.

 http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2006/07/117553.php

Jury indicated it could not reach a verdict, but was ordered to push on?

These charges were that he collected maps of the Australian electricity supply system in preparation of a terrorist act (15 years), BUT WITH NO DETAILS ABOUT THE PREPARATION ACCEPT MATERIAL TO SUPPORT THOUGHT CRIME? that he sought information on chemical prices for the use of explosives for a terrorist act (life), BUT NO SOUND EVIDENCE ABOUT WHETHER THE CHEMICALS WERE GOING TO BE PURCHASED OR USED FOR THE USE OF EXPLOSIVES OR A TERRORIST ACT and that he possessed a document with information on the manufacture of poisons and bombs in preparation for a terrorist act (15 years). THAT HE LIKE MANY OTHERS MAY HAVE DOWNLOADED FROM THE INTERNET WHICH IS NOT ILLEGAL USUALLY?

 http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2006/06/115129.php

A dangerous precedent: Australian man convicted of “preparing terrorism”

Since 2001, the government has seized upon the “war” declared by US President George Bush for both domestic and international purposes. Under the guise of combating terrorism it has participated in the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, diverted attention from mounting economic and social problems at home and legitimised previously unthinkable police state-style measures, including semi-secret trials, “preventative” detention and the ability to impose life sentences without any evidence of an actual terrorist act.

 http://adelaide.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/16401

Secret evidence used in Australian “terrorist” trial

Lodhi was bundled into the court building in shackles, in full view of the media. The display was intended to convey the impression that he is a violent and highly dangerous individual. Like several other Muslim men charged with terrorist offences in Australia over the past year, Lodhi has been denied bail and held in virtual solitary confinement in a “super max” prison, cut off from family and friends. Under state and federal “counter-terrorism” laws, the traditional presumption in favour of bail has been scrapped. It will only be granted in “exceptional circumstances”. On receiving a confidential affidavit from the Commonwealth, Magistrate Michael Price imposed a number of secrecy orders despite vigorous objections by lawyers for Lodhi and by media organisations. The orders mean that the affidavit itself will remain suppressed, and the media is barred from disclosing even the general nature of the material relied upon in it.

 http://www.indymedia.org/en/2004/12/866066.shtml

Merry Christmas Mr Kent and Mr Haddara

After and ASIO fishing expedition they were charged last month with knowingly belonging to a Melbourne-based terrorist group, that did not exist.

 http://adelaide.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/9799

ASIO raid family home

This is an assault on civil liberties, for all Australians - on the eve of Human Rights Day 2005 that marks the day in 1948, that the United Nations adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Shame hoWARd shame on you!

 http://adelaide.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/9706

Tight security impedes scapegoat case

Indymedia has learnt this includes a bank account his supporters say was set up to fund legal representation for Muslims facing any kind of legal action. The prosecution is understood to allege the money was intended for terrorist purposes.

 http://adelaide.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/9693

Some evidence is prejudicial to national insecurity

It has been previously reported that he is facing nine charges and is accused of planning a major terrorist attack on Sydney defence sites and the electricity grid using downloads off the internet and having 100 rolls of toilet paper to wipe his arse after low level bombs and farts. Shit!

 http://adelaide.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/9682

Terrorism suspects' custody conditions 'inhumane'

"This treatment is very cruel and inhumane and what I've put forward to the Premier Morris Iemma to intervene and put an end to this scandal," he said.

 http://adelaide.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/9657

DPP should lose the plot!

Now why would the DPP do that? Based on some notion I suppose, that john hoWARd (the hangman) wants to use Thomas's butt again, to raise the fear stakes in the introduction of the new Anti-Liberty-Dissent Directives!

 http://adelaide.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/9617

Things and places identified

He said Mulahalilovic worked as a handyman, lived with his wife, parents and brother and, with the help of family members, could provide around $1 million security to ensure his freedom until trial.

 http://adelaide.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/9423

Dangerous handyman terror threat?

But the only mother of SATAN here is John HoWARd and his new Ant-Terrorism Bill!

 http://adelaide.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/9418

Terror suspects 'kept in dark'

"They're all kept in solitary confinement, they're kept in Guantanamo Bay style conditions and they're very oppressive," he said.

 http://adelaide.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/9413

What are the dangerous chemicals police found when they went fishing?

If police say they were making bombs when they were painting motor vehicles then the only terrorist act that wasn't prevented was when police went on a fishing expedition.

 http://adelaide.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/9395

Man shot by police in fishing raids

But there is no such thing as an independent investigation team in NSW because police investigate themselves and cannot be relied upon ever.

 http://adelaide.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/9392

ASIO fishing expedition makes arrests

Are you satisfied truthseeker? Well I'm not this is just another public relations exercise that no one can prove. But trust us we know best?

 http://adelaide.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/9384

hoWARd, ruddock, ellison, keelty and news ltd plotted chaos

Now they go on in the article to describe themselves as intelligence officials? But I'm sorry to say that any group of people who ask another group of people to believe what they believe based on no evidence is amongst the most unintelligent and lost group of people the world has ever known.

 http://adelaide.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/8663

Houses raided over 'possible' political attack plans?

"Furthermore, nothing is reasonable about a raid on people's homes because for an alleged possibility. For those sorts of enquiries one should approach a 'soothsayer' and if you get the all clear only then should they approach people via the front door with the appropriate warrant to search one's home. A warrant based on concrete evidence that has been filtered by a juge or magistrate of the court to see whether the material is frivolous or vexatious."

 http://adelaide.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/8659

If he'd been given his passport he'd be a free man

During his trial Mr Mallah's defence counsel said he was only trying to sustain the media spotlight when he sold details of his plans to an undercover officer posing as a journalist.

 http://adelaide.indymedia.org/newswire/display_any/8192

Melbourne man charged over ASIO links

Apparently this victim will appear before the Melbourne Magistrates Court later today and hopefully he won't be sent to the nearest "AA" Super-max prison for "social isolation" just in case ASIO aren't telling us the truth!

 http://adelaide.indymedia.org/newswire/display/7545/index.php

Australian prisoners' linked to Bin Laden: Ten News

Hatzistergos: "For example, because of a perceived risk that they may engage in, or incite other persons to engage in, terrorist activities."

Terrorist prisoners held in a "box within a box" with no "fresh air or sunlight" at Goulburn HRMU may incite alleged terrorists in Long Bay to blow up Long Bay Prison's Twin Towers?

 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/liverpool/2004/11/300344.html

Andrew Sullivan and the Tortued Truth

Mr. Habib said he was taken to a room with hooks on the wall and a barrel, set sideways like a roller, on the floor. His arms were stretched out, he said, and each wrist was handcuffed and fastened to a hook on the wall. By his description, the only way not to be left hanging was to stand on the barrel; an electric wire ran through it. Mr. Habib said he believed the interrogators in that room were Pakistani.

Mr. Habib said that when he refused to confess to being part of a 1995 terror plot, one man turned on the current. He lifted his feet to avoid the shock, he recalled, and he was suspended from the wall.

"I lost everything," he said.

 http://bodyandsoul.typepad.com/blog/2005/02/theres_been_a_s.html